Skip to main content
Category

Blog

A former regulator’s take on AI, Big Tech, and RCM

A former regulator’s take on AI, Big Tech, and RCM

By Blog

Rick Bonhof. Managing Consultant, SynechronWe recently sat down with Rick Bonhof, a managing consultant who leads the Amsterdam regulatory change and compliance practice within the business consulting arm of Synechron—a leading digital transformation consulting firm that accelerates digital initiatives for banks, asset managers, and insurance companies around the world.

In his role, Bonhof oversees a team of experts who help clients build the regulatory framework that enables compliance. As an advisor for the digital-first firm, Bonhof is hyperfocused on making compliance more efficient through the use of technology, leveraging emerging tech such as machine learning and existing systems such as GRCs.

Prior to Synechron, Bonhof served as a supervision officer for Dutch regulator Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) at the height of the 2008 financial crisis. After spending seven years crafting and executing supervisory strategy for AFM, he decided to redirect his work from supervising firms to actually helping them become compliant with regulation. And so, after witnessing how Synechron helped a number of financial institutions get back on track with EMIR (the EU equivalent of Dodd Frank in the US), Bonhof transitioned to the firm.

During our sit-down, Bonhof shared his blended supervisory-consultative perspective on a variety of topics—from the role of regulatory change management during the COVID-19 pandemic to how Big Tech will shape the future of financial services.

Editor’s note: This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.

Setting the Record Straight on Regulators

Touching on his experience as a former regulator, Bonhof kicked off our conversation by sharing what he wished compliance professionals knew about regulators, and what he wished he had known as a regulator. 

When I made the switch from regulator to consultant, I realized that a lot of financial firms are afraid of regulators. But the reality is that regulators are people too and most are not out to fine you. What I think compliance professionals sometimes forget is that if you’re able to explain to regulators why you made certain decisions and how you implemented certain requirements, they’ll listen to you.

“A lot of financial firms are afraid of regulators. But the reality is that regulators are people too and most are not out to fine you.”

My advice to compliance professionals is to document their interpretation of the rule and why they applied the rule in a certain way according to their interpretation, so they have all of the information they need when it comes time to talk to regulators.

On the flip side, what I wish I had known as a regulator was, no matter how simple a request for information may seem on paper, it doesn’t actually mean that there’s a clearcut way to gather requested information or to implement a new rule. Many financial institutions do not start out as multinational global-spending institutions—they grow through mergers, acquisitions, and restructuring.

So there’s a whole collection of teams that suddenly need to contribute to this “one simple request,” making it not so simple after all.

Managing Regulatory Change in the Time of COVID 

Bonhof has long emphasized the importance of having a well-documented regulatory change management (RCM) strategy, especially when it comes to major events such as financial crises, election years and of course — the COVID-19 pandemic.

When it comes to regulatory change management, my mantra has been “take control, be in control, and demonstrate control.” 

“Take control” is about understanding what your obligations are, understanding the impact of them, and then implementing and enforcing a compliant process.

“Be in control” is about understanding where your firm is in terms of compliance with the requirements, and revisiting both its requirements and compliance processes frequently. You should not only be control testing your processes to understand whether your firm is compliant with existing rules, but also monitoring whether there’s a change coming that could impact compliance with those rules. And, if there is a change on the horizon, then you need to go back to “take control” and proactively act on it.

Lastly, “demonstrate control” is about being able to take the evidence that you have and explain both internally and externally to what extent you comply with those measures.

How to Avoid Dropping the Ball on RCM

In Bonhof’s view, the biggest mistake that firms can make when implementing RCM best practices, is to treat them as a one-time solution. 

Most regulatory change management processes are driven by a regulatory change implementation date. Let’s say that a firm has to comply with X, Y, and Z by January 1, 2021. What I’ve found (and even been guilty of myself) is that many firms focus solely on making that milestone without the end result in mind. So once the firm does reach it, everyone sort of drops the ball and says, “We’re done, we made it.” But that’s the wrong approach because 2021 does not mark the end of implementing that change, it actually marks the start of it. 

What I’ve found (and even been guilty of myself) is that many firms focus solely on making [a] milestone without the end result in mind.

Firms are expected to be compliant with that new rule, and need to have a roadmap that accounts for what comes after that date. Firms often put makeshift technical solutions in place to meet the deadline, but then what happens is the technical solution silently becomes the structural solution. The result is that there’s no roadmap beyond that point to account for new data that needs to be tracked or changed, resulting in an issue of data quality and therefore explainability. 

COVID Response: Swings of the Regulatory Pendulum

To Bonhof, regulatory change management has never been more important as the pandemic response continues to fold. While he and his team have seen the easing of certain regulatory requirements, they have also seen the mounting impact of others.

On the one hand, the regulatory response to the pandemic has been to suspend certain requirements in order to alleviate the burden of regulation. However, at the same time, we’ve also seen an increase in requests for financial firms to implement certain risk measures from regulators such as the European Securities and Markets Authority

For example, we had an “intelligent lockdown” in the Netherlands that prohibited us from going to the shops or the cinema. As a result, this (like other lockdowns across the globe) had a large impact on service providers, as many businesses had outstanding loans with financial institutions and were suddenly not able to make good on those loans. This has led to a tipping of scales with regulators adding more capital reporting requirements, while continuing to suspend or delay implementation of other regulatory requirements. For example, ESMA deferred the final two phases of its bilateral margin requirements to provide additional operational capacity for counterparties to respond to the immediate impact of COVID-19. 

On the Importance of Innovation in IRM

While regulators have been more forgiving during the pandemic, they have also become increasingly more aware of all of the possible gap—bringing the topic of Integrated Risk Management (IRM) to the fore. Here’s Bonhof’s take on IRM.

Integrated Risk Management allows you to identify what risks exist within your firm, define a response to those risks, and then determine whether your firm is within that risk appetite. Ultimately, IRM combines all of those processes and rolls them up into a multi-level process chart where you can prioritize risks and pinpoint which ones are of the highest risk to your firm. 

IRM is such a hot concept right now because regulators are putting more emphasis on it.

As part of Synechron’s FinLabs RegTech accelerator suite, I’ve actually had the opportunity to work on automating parts of IRM. Knowing how effective your controls are is a key part of integrated risk management, so we built an intelligent control testing environment that maps a firm’s individual control statements into a decision tree that automatically runs against a data set to help firms quickly pinpoint whether a control is effective or not. This advancement frees up compliance teams’ valuable resources so they can focus on remediating any deficiencies.

These types of innovation are becoming more important as Integrated Risk Management continues to gain more traction. IRM is such a hot concept right now because regulators are putting more emphasis on it. For example, ESMA recently published a consultation paper that assessed the suitability of the management at financial institutions, which concluded that the highest levels of management (including at the board level) need to understand their firms’ requirements, how they are complying with them, and what the state of the firm’s risk management looks like.  

Clash of the Titans: Big Banking vs. Big Tech

As an innovator in his own right, Bonhof is naturally drawn to industry disruptors. In particular, he has been following the rise of digital banks and believes that it’s only a matter of time until Big Tech enters into the banking industry as well.

The rise in digital banks has served as a catalyst for digital transformation in the industry at large. In order to stay competitive with digital banks, traditional banks have worked to provide digital services to their customers. For customers, having a digital bank account becomes more of a commodity because it opens up a whole ecosystem of additional services around it. 

For digital banks, their competitive advantage is that they’re not burdened by a chain linked system of legacy tools or processes, so they can get it right immediately. Digital banks can be more nimble when it comes to things like digital client onboarding processes and company reporting. On the other hand, it’s difficult for digital banks to achieve the same scale as larger banks. Plus, they’re bound to face the same kind of regulatory requirements as incumbent banks and will need to comply with them, lessening some of their initial competitive edge.

When Big Tech enters the market, it will drive a significant change that some incumbent banks will likely not be able to transition through and will lose traction within the market. 

What I’m really curious about is when Big Tech will officially enter into the banking space. Today, we have Apple Pay and Google Pay, but I think that it’s just a matter of time before they’re adding banking services to their offering. At that point the market will change. Digital banks just mark the beginning of the banking industry’s digital transformation. When Big Tech enters the market, it will drive a significant change that some incumbent banks will likely not be able to transition through and will lose traction within the market. 

Financial Firms and Regulators to Step Up Their AI Game

With the high likelihood of Big Tech companies entering the market in addition to other innovations in financial services, Bonhof is encouraging the industry to direct its focus toward emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) now, before it’s too late.

I think regulators really need to step up their digital game. They need to understand the tech component that goes into digital banking. AFM just compiled an insightful trend report where they spoke around their fears about Big Tech entering into the financial market. Today, Big Tech is predominantly supervised by privacy watchdogs. But, if Big Tech entered the financial market tomorrow, financial market regulators would not always be allowed to share information with those supervisory agencies, so that would make supervision really difficult. 

Regulators are just now issuing responses around the use of AI, which center around the concepts of explainability and trustworthiness. Together, they are two sides of the same coin because they help explain the decisions that come out of algorithms and apply fair principles that limit their biases. However, I still think that we have a ways to go and that regulation around the use of AI will only continue to increase in the future as the digital market matures.

The Role of AI in Regulatory Compliance

According to Bonhof, the role of AI is not just limited to the mechanics of digital banking. It applies to regulatory compliance too.

We recognize that regulators are starting to provide guidelines around AI, so we are changing the way that we advise our clients about AI. AI was once the new and exciting thing to talk about. Now it’s the means to an end. We’re looking at where AI models can help firms improve explainability in their compliance processes. 

AI was once the new and exciting thing to talk about. Now it’s the means to an end.

Using robotics (or AI) helps automate certain regulatory compliance processes such as horizon scanning, and makes the outcomes of those processes more predictable and reliable. AI allows teams to focus less time doing the monotonous work of running these processes and more time on investigating outliers. Instead, the “robot” leads the processes and identifies areas where there are inconsistencies that require the review of compliance experts.

On Implementing RegTech: Final Advice

So, what’s Bonhof’s advice to firms that are looking to implement new technologies in their compliance programs? “Be really clear about what you want to achieve in your compliance program and therefore what you want the technology to achieve.”

First, you need to understand where you are and where you want to go. For instance, if your firm was just fined by a regulator, then you’ll likely need to find a solution that can help you become more compliant. On the other hand, if your organization is in a good place but needs to become more efficient, then it’s likely you’ll need a different tech stack than the firm that was recently fined. When you understand what you want to achieve by adding technology, then you can better pinpoint the right type of technology solution for your compliance program.

 

If you’d like to learn more about Synechron, visit their website. To learn more about Rick Bonhof, connect with him on LinkedIn

If you’d like to contact an Ascent team member, you can do so here. Stay tuned for our next interview from the lines of defense. All interviews will be featured in our monthly Cliff Notes newsletter, which you can subscribe to below.

Subscribe to Cliff Notes


Webinar screenshot

[Webinar] Effectively Managing Your Regulatory Obligations Register

By Blog

Struggling to understand what your organization needs to comply with? Wasting too much time and resources scraping through regulations and building your obligation register? You’re not alone.

In this webinar, experts from LogicGate and Ascent we walk you through regulatory compliance insights and best practices to save you time and resources.

Learning Objectives

» What is the difference between a “top down” vs. “bottom up” approach to regulatory compliance?

» How do you evidence compliance, especially during a pandemic when the labor force is spread out?

» Boards are scrutinizing compliance more closely; how do you balance in-house staff, outsourcing, and technology?

» Learn how to set up a repeatable process around your compliance program to manage change & downstream impact.

Speakers

  • Brian Clark, Founder and President, Ascent
  • Marc Van de Ven, Sr. Solutions Engineer, LogicGate
  • Moderated by Megan Brown, Head of Strategic Alliances, LogicGate

This webinar is hosted by OCEG (Open Compliance and Ethics Group)

 

About the Ascent / LogicGate Platform Integration

LogicGate Risk Cloud™ is a cloud-based platform with a suite of risk management applications that transforms the way businesses manage their governance, risk and compliance processes. Now with a powerful new integration, you can fuel your compliance program housed in LogicGate Risk Cloud™ with targeted regulatory data from Ascent. Seamlessly map your regulatory obligations and citations to your controls and P&Ps, trigger change alerts, and more. Learn more about Ascent’s API integrations here

 

For monthly insights on compliance and technology, subscribe to our monthly newsletter Cliff Notes below.

Subscribe


Ascent Named to the Prestigious RegTech 100 List for the Third Consecutive Year

By Blog, Featured

Ascent has been named to the prestigious RegTech 100 list for the third year running. The RegTech 100 list is comprised of the world’s most innovative technology firms helping financial services firms address the challenges of regulatory compliance.

Press Release | Chicago, IL | December 2, 2020 Ascent, an AI-driven solution that helps customers identify the regulatory obligations and rule updates that apply to them, is today celebrating the news that the firm has been named to the prestigious RegTech 100 list for the third year running. Overseen by specialist research firm RegTech Analyst, the RegTech 100 recognizes the world’s most innovative technology providers that are solving a significant industry problem, or to generate efficiency improvements across the compliance function. 

READ MORE:  Rapid Review: What is RegTech?

 

Ascent’s groundbreaking RegulationAI™ rapidly and accurately identifies a financial firm’s regulatory obligations, then keeps them updated as rules change. This targeted regulatory knowledge can be accessed and managed through Ascents cloud-based platform, or fed into a separate GRC (governance, risk and compliance) via API. 

By automating a process that would typically take compliance personnel significant time to complete manually, Ascent helps maximize efficiencies, reduce error, and ensure that firms know exactly what needs to be done in order to avoid fines and mitigate risk. 

“Ascent was founded to give businesses greater confidence in their compliance and risk operations. The turmoil of 2020 has highlighted for us the importance of that mission.” —Brian Clark, President and Founder, Ascent

“We are honored to once again be named in the RegTech 100,” said Brian Clark, Ascent President and Founder. “Ascent was founded to give businesses greater confidence in their compliance and risk operations. The turmoil of 2020 has highlighted for us the importance of that mission. The age-old problem of regulatory compliance – ‘you don’t know what you don’t know’ – is what Ascent was built to solve, and by doing so, we aim to help our customers achieve certainty in an uncertain world.”

“The RegTech100 list helps senior management filter through all the vendors in the market by highlighting the leading companies in [each] sector.” —Mariyan Dimitrov, Director of Research, RegTech Analyst

RegTech Analyst director of research Mariyan Dimitrov said, “Banks and other financial institutions need to be aware of the latest RegTech innovation in the market in order to avoid new compliance risks and stay competitive despite new regulations around customer onboarding and remote communication post Covid-19. The RegTech100 list helps senior management filter through all the vendors in the market by highlighting the leading companies in [each] sector.”

Ascent has been rapidly gaining momentum since its founding in 2015. Since its inception, Ascent has secured $26.7M in funding and doubled its staff. Ascent serves a range of financial institutions, including global financial firms and SMBs in the banking, securities, and derivatives industries.   

Ascent's RegTech 100 Badge

 

To stay up on the latest in regulatory technology and other news, subscribe to our monthly Cliff Notes newsletter below.

 

Subscribe


Regulatory Change Management: A Tech-Based Approach

By Blog

What is Regulatory Change Management?

Regulatory change management (RCM) is a multi-step process that ensures your organization stays compliant with any new changes in regulation. At a high level, RCM involves the intake of regulatory changes (rule amendments or additions), determining the impact of those changes to the organization’s existing obligations, updating the necessary controls, policies and procedures, and then working with the lines of business to ensure those changes are socialized and implemented.

Flow chart of traditional regulatory change management process (manual)

Firms Struggle with Regulatory Change

For regulated businesses, keeping up with the torrent of regulatory change is a constant struggle. In an environment where rule updates have increased by 500 percent in the last decade, Risk and Compliance workers face a confluence of challenges:

  • Compliance personnel must determine the impact of rule amendments or additions to their existing obligations, a process that repeats with every change in regulation.
  • Relevant changes must be reconciled with a firm’s controls, policies and procedures. Manual documentation and siloed pockets of knowledge throughout the organization leave the business vulnerable to human error.
  • The economic turmoil spurred by COVID-19 has seen many companies reigning in their budgets. As a result, those tasked with regulatory change management are now being asked to do more with fewer resources.

There are some 300 million pages of regulatory documents published globally, full of dense language and crucial but often subtle implications. Teasing out relevant regulatory obligations from these texts and mapping them to your organization has historically required countless hours of manual work. 

READ MORE: Regulatory mapping is key to compliance. Are you doing it effectively?

 

As compliance operations move increasingly into the digital era, it is clear that regulatory change management is particularly ripe for automation. 

 

Regulatory Change Management in the Age of Digitalization

Technological innovation has allowed financial firms to significantly improve their compliance processes. Here are some of the ways RegTech tools are helping financial institutions better manage regulatory change:

» By collecting regulatory content in one place, making it easier to monitor the regulatory landscape and reducing reliance on email/mailing lists.

» By surfacing regulatory changes that apply to a specific firm, narrowing the universe to applicable insights only.

»By helping compliance personnel organize and triage regulatory changes by mapping them to the firm’s business taxonomy.

» By helping compliance personnel map regulatory changes to the firm’s policies and controls, streamlining the process of assessing impact.

» By providing continuous insights, updating a firm’s obligations register in real time and flagging instances where operations no longer match requirements. 

Modern approaches to compliance risk are becoming increasingly necessary as regulation continues to grow and evolve. By investing in regulatory change management tools, financial firms are able to increase their compliance team’s efficiency and effectiveness while proactively protecting the business from regulatory and reputational risk. 

READ MORE: Solution Highlight: How Ascent Automates Regulatory Change Management

 

To stay up on the latest in regulatory technology and other news, subscribe to our monthly Cliff Notes newsletter below.

 

Subscribe


Ascent and Munich Re Group Announce Groundbreaking Partnership to Protect Ascent Customers Against Fines and Regulatory Risk

By Blog

Today, Ascent and Munich Re announce a groundbreaking partnership to protect Ascent customers against fines and regulatory risk. Ascent’s AI-powered RegTech solution, already the industry leader, is first to provide this level of protection to its users.

“Our partnership with Ascent further underscores our view of the maturation of AI as a tool to limit the probabilities of risk and is a great example of how our bespoke AI insurance and Ascent’s market leading machine learning platform is adding value at all levels.” —Greg Barats, Senior Executive, Munich Re & President & CEO, HSB

Chicago and Munich: Nov. 17, 2020 Ascent, a provider of AI-driven solutions that identify and update a company’s regulatory obligations, announced a groundbreaking partnership with Munich Re Group, one of the world’s leaders in providing insurance and reinsurance. For the first time in the market, this partnership provides a way to insure against the potential exposure and costs associated with regulatory risk for all Ascent customers. 

Using its proprietary RegulationAI™, Ascent generates the regulatory obligations that pertain specifically to the customer and keeps them updated as rules change, doing automatically what takes individual Risk and Compliance personnel hundreds of hours per regulator to accomplish manually. This automated delivery of targeted regulatory intelligence helps banks and financial services companies reduce their regulatory and reputational risk, avoid fines, and lower their overall cost to comply.

LEARN MORE: Ascent Solution Overview

 

Munich Re Group has tested Ascent’s technology and is insuring it. This enables Ascent to guarantee that any user of the Ascent system is safe from the risk of potential regulatory fines as long as they properly comply with the regulatory obligations that the platform generates. 

Brian Clark, Ascent Founder & CEO, commented: “One of the driving factors in founding Ascent was to provide our customers with a platform that makes it easier and less expensive to do the right thing in following their regulatory requirements and managing regulatory change. This exciting agreement with Munich Re Group provides further validation for that notion. Munich Re evaluated Ascent’s groundbreaking approach to the use of AI and machine learning in analyzing regulations and understood that we were an ideal partner for mitigating and eliminating regulatory and compliance risk.”

Greg Barats, Senior Executive at Munich Re and President & CEO of HSB, a Munich Re Group company, commented: “Our partnership with Ascent further underscores our view of the maturation of AI as a tool to limit the probabilities of risk and is a great example of how our bespoke AI insurance and Ascent’s market leading machine learning platform is adding value at all levels. It enables Ascent to offer its RegulationAI™ with a performance protection that is unique to the market and gives them a competitive advantage. Their clients can adopt innovative technology with much more confidence, based on our assessment and the risk-transfer structure developed from it.”  

Ascent has been rapidly gaining momentum since its founding in 2015. Since its inception, Ascent has secured $26.7M in funding and doubled its staff. Ascent serves a range of financial institutions, including global financial firms and SMBs in the banking, securities, and derivatives industries. 

READ MORE: RegulationAI™: World-Class Technology Built for Compliance

 

To learn more about how Ascent can help you identify and manage your changing regulatory obligations, contact us directly. For fresh articles and insights on RegTech and compliance, subscribe to our monthly newsletter Cliff Notes below.

Subscribe


How an Integrated Risk Management (IRM) approach can transform your organization

By Blog

Today there are more risk drivers that span across more areas of business, making it harder to monitor, manage, and mitigate risk than ever before. Yet much of the financial services industry is continuing to approach risk in the same way it always has—through two distinct silos of compliance and risk. However, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the cracks in these traditional approaches, and raised the need for a more comprehensive approach called Integrated Risk Management (IRM).

“The response to the coronavirus pandemic is a perfect example of when the [three lines of defense] and traditional risk governance don’t work very well. Traditional approaches fail because they can’t effectively deal with fast-moving and interconnected risks.” — Malcolm Murray, VP, Gartner Audit & Risk practice.

In this article, we cover:

An Overview of IRM and How It’s Different From Other Approaches

There are many factors that drive the overwhelming pace of change across financial firms’ risk profiles. These factors include:

  • The sweeping adoption of digital tools to meet consumer needs, which requires a reliance on external-facing third-party vendors.
  • The adoption of third-party vendors to manage behind-the-scenes complexities; often these new technologies and integrations must access consumer data collected by the firm, or they themselves collect more consumer data—a reality that leads to more subsequent risk.
  • Business expansion into other markets across the nation and around the globe, adding liability as both the number of consumers to protect and the number of regulators to adhere to multiply.
  • The reality of regulatory complexities, which is increasing on both a national and global scale.

How firms monitor, manage, and mitigate the risk associated with these factors depends on their risk and compliance philosophy. Here are two approaches that firms often take and how they compare to an IRM strategy.

Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC)

To understand IRM, it’s important to also understand how it came to be. In 2002, a series of financial scandals led to the passage of Sarbanes Oxley (SOX), a federal law that created a set of rules for accountants, auditors, and corporate officers, and imposed more stringent recordkeeping requirements on financial firms especially. As a result, the industry developed the discipline of “governance, risk, and compliance” (GRC) to keep up with and manage these SOX requirements.

Over time, the role of innovation began to play a more prominent role within the governance, risk, and compliance discipline to both align IT with business objectives, and effectively manage risk and meet compliance requirements. This ultimately led to the creation of GRC-focused technology designed to help companies achieve these goals.

As time has passed, the GRC acronym has become synonymous with the GRC technology itself, which has led to the framework of the GRC discipline being conflated with the technology that powers it. But the framework that connects governance, risk, and compliance is an essential part of monitoring, managing, and mitigating risk effectively.

A conventional GRC framework is typically carried out by the three lines of defense, which are each responsible for a different aspect of overall risk management:

  • 1st line of defense: Line management should act as the first line of defense, identifying risks and implementing controls.
  • 2nd line of defense: Risk and assurance functions such as legal, compliance and enterprise risk management (ERM) should act as a second line, overseeing and monitoring risk management processes.
  • 3rd line of defense: Internal audit should act as a third line, taking a birds’ eye view of the effectiveness of controls and risk management.

(Source: Gartner)

While the three lines of defense model is important, it can also make reacting to new risks difficult because it is more meticulous and is often disjointed from the rest of the organization, including at the executive and board level.

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

As SOX compliance auditing and the GRC framework were taking shape, the role of enterprise risk was evolving as well. Risk mitigation was historically covered by purchasing insurance—such as property insurance, liability insurance, and malpractice insurance—to deal with literal events like natural disasters and theft, as well as lawsuits and claims relating to damage, loss, or injury. However, as more drivers of risk began to surface for firms, risk professionals expanded their purview to include risks associated with technology (particularly technological failures), company supply chains, and business expansion.

In response to this expanded risk profile, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) created the concept of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) to spot risks and map them throughout a traditional company structure. ERM typically involves the highest levels within an organization, including executive and board-level decision makers, as it is intended to connect all of the departments across the organization.

While ERM is meant to help organizations proactively manage and mitigate company-wide risks, it does not oversee the management and implementation of the measures necessary to prevent and mitigate risk, especially in relation to regulatory compliance.

Integrated Risk Management (IRM)

In 2016, Gartner revisited the concepts of GRC and ERM and determined that each, while critical, didn’t fully connect all of the dots from a risk and compliance perspective. So, Gartner created a renewed framework that addressed both the high-level strategy of managing risk, as well as the hands-on work of making these strategies possible. And so Integrated Risk Management was born.

The numbers speak for themselves:

  • 57 percent of senior-level executives rank “risk and compliance” as one of the top two risk categories they felt least prepared to address.
  • 87 percent of organizations see tech risk management as a siloed, reactive process rather than an organization-wide function for proactive risk management.
  • Only 4 percent of organizations feel that their third-party risk management tools fully integrate and capture overall risk for reporting purposes.

IRM helps organizations address all of these concerns. It is an umbrella approach that bridges ERM and GRC—both relying on ERM strategy to identify risk drivers, and the framework of GRC to implement the actual work of compliance. Through this connection, IRM creates a comprehensive view that:

  • Exposes any risk management gaps that exist due to silos
  • Proactively monitors, tracks, and implements compliance measures across all of the areas identified by the company’s executive-led ERM strategy

In turn, this enables companies to be more agile in their response to unforeseen circumstances, as IRM is both a top-down and bottom-up approach that includes executive and board-level leadership and the teams that do the actual work.

“Rather than putting compliance first, integrated risk management enables an organization to manage its unique set of risks that face its organization specifically and in turn meet compliance requirements as a part of that mission.” CyberSaint Security

The Six Practice Areas of IRM

Gartner defines IRM through six practice areas:

six practice areas of integrated risk management

1.  Strategy: Enablement and implementation of a framework, including performance improvement through effective governance and risk ownership

2. Assessment: Identification, evaluation and prioritization of risks

3. Response: Identification and implementation of mechanisms to mitigate risk

4. Communication and reporting: Provision of the best or most appropriate means to track and inform stakeholders of an enterprise’s risk response

5. Monitoring: Identification and implementation of processes that methodically track governance objectives, risk ownership/accountability, compliance with policies and decisions that are set through the governance process, risks to those objectives and the effectiveness of risk mitigation and controls

6. Technology: Design and implementation of an IRM solution (IRMS) architecture

Ultimately, IRM oversees, prepares for, and mitigates all of the aspects that make up a company’s dynamic risk profile, such as physical, technological, data-oriented, and regulatory risk. According to LogicGate, an agile GRC cloud solution and Ascent integration partner:

“Integrated Risk Management gives business leaders a clear picture of all their risks. With their newfound understanding of the enterprise’s dynamic risk profile, they can make better decisions at the enterprise level about which risks to mitigate and which to accept or transfer. By integrating risk areas and recognizing interdependencies, executives can ask more strategic questions about how risk is one part of the business impacts other parts of the business.”

LEARN MORE: Ascent GRC Integrations

 

The First Steps in Implementing an IRM Strategy

The first steps in building an IRM strategy focuses on two of the six practice areas (Strategy & Assess):

1. Outline your company goals and strategy

2. Determine which stakeholders ladder up to those areas of business

3. Identify the key risk drivers from those areas of business, including those associated with regulatory compliance

To identify the risks associated with regulatory compliance, it’s important to start from the beginning. At Ascent, we use the most granular regulatory data in the industry to help risk and compliance teams pinpoint and map their regulatory requirements / obligations throughout their organizations. This is especially important when trying to set a regulatory compliance framework for the first time or address any gaps within a firm’s existing regulatory compliance framework.

Our AI-driven technology called RegulationAI takes this process one step further, by keeping firms’ obligations updated so they never miss a regulatory change that could expose them to additional risk. These dynamic granular obligations are even more powerful when they’re seamlessly tied into GRC platforms, such as LogicGate and IBM OpenPages—a capability that Ascent has built through its API integrations.

To learn more about Ascent’s API integrations, contact us directly.

Preparing for the potential regulatory impact of the U.S. election

By Blog

Election years bring the potential for regulatory change. Here are a few developments in financial regulation worth tracking, plus surefire preparation tips no matter which party holds office.

Election years are uncertain times for financial institutions, as the possibility of a new administration also brings the potential for a new and different regulatory philosophy. In turn, a new philosophy can often create a shift in regulatory compliance and the potential for economic volatility. Risk and Compliance teams wisely prepare for both outcomes by preemptively identifying potential risk drivers as well as developing mitigation strategies.

However, one risk driver that’s easily overlooked is the fine detail in regulatory requirements. These shifts may not garner the headlines of bold congressional actions, but they can seriously impact your business. Below are a few regulatory developments to track during this particularly complex election season.

READ MORE: What are ‘granular’ obligations and how do they reduce your risk?

Standardizing Regulation Across State and Federal Levels

The current administration’s emphasis on deregulation could end abruptly should a Democratic administration take its place. For instance, the new SEC Regulation Best Interest standards (Reg BI), which require brokers and their broker-dealers to act in their clients’ best interest when making an investment recommendation, weren’t comprehensive enough for some state regulators. As a result, they moved ahead with their own rules to tighten requirements, but 2020’s tumultuous landscape could slow these state-led efforts, especially in light of the election. If a Democratic administration is elected, it’s possible that it could address the Reg BI issues by calling for more substantial oversight from the SEC to help tighten up the rule for both brokers and dealers alike at a national level.  

Balancing Regulation and Consumer Rights

The current administration has focused on easing banking regulations. In 2018, it took aim at the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in the shape of “The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act,” a bill that rolled back parts of Dodd-Frank. Today, the law waives stress tests for banks with assets of $250 million or less, and  restrictions on proprietary trading—the Volcker Rule—for banks with assets of $10 billion or less. Additionally, the current administration gave an executive order that directed the Treasury to evaluate any regulations positioned against the goal of making banks as competitive as possible to ultimately benefit consumer choice. If elected, a Democratic administration would likely focus on a significantly different set of priorities, which could mean reinforcement of Dodd-Frank and a reinvigorated Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The Evolution of “Banking”

The current COO of the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has proposed a new “Payments Charter” that allows fintech payment companies like PayPal and Stripe and crypto companies to obtain a formal national banking charter. According to Forbes, if the proposed charter is instated, it will roll out in two phases: phase one would “grant the institution a federal pre-emption, or a federal money transmitter license,” and phase two would give the institution “access to the Federal Reserve.”  Meanwhile, the FDIC has been trying to help fintechs partner with banks more easily through its technology lab (FDiTech), which was created to “reduce the regulatory and operational uncertainty” associated with these types of partnerships. These measures will enable banks, particularly community banks, to better serve customers and compete with larger entities. 

Takeaways for Risk and Compliance Professionals

No matter the outcome of election season, regulation and regulatory change aren’t going anywhere, and their financial burden continue to grow. According to the Credit Union National Association, the financial impact of regulations rose from $6.1 billion in 2017 to $7 billion in 2019. Similarly, regardless of who wins the election, current regulatory trends will be intensified, or a shift in direction will occur. Both spell changes for your organization. 

The key is to pay attention to the details. Based on Ascent’s internal analysis of regulatory text, only about 35 percent of any given regulation consists of actual obligations. The bulk of regulation—the remaining 65 percent—is made up of non-obligations such as definitions and clarifications. Here are a few ways that you can keep track of even the smallest of regulatory updates that have the potential to impact your business:

1) Keep tabs on regulation at both the national and state level, paying particular attention to the agencies overseen directly by the White House. It’s within these agencies that incremental change is most likely to occur, resulting in the regulatory shifts that can catch your organization off guard.

  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
  • National Credit Union Association (NCUA)
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
  • Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
  • Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) (overseen by the SEC)

2) Shore up your integrated risk management strategy by identifying all of your key risk factors—including the potential gaps across your firm’s regulatory compliance knowledge and operations. Not sure where to start? Ascent can help. Here are a few ways that financial firms use our regulatory technology to pinpoint their exact regulatory obligations, keep them updated, and shore up their overall approach to managing risk.

 

Want to learn how regulatory technology can help protect your firm from fines and risk? Then subscribe to our monthly newsletter Cliff Notes. You can also contact us directly.

Subscribe


What are ‘granular’ regulatory obligations and how do they reduce your risk?

By Blog

The challenge of knowing your obligations

What are regulatory requirements?

Regulatory requirements (also referred to as regulatory obligations or mandates) are an affirmative duty on an organization to complete, or refrain from, a set of actions in order to remain compliant with the law. Compliance personnel will typically analyze legal text to determine the regulatory requirements their organization must adhere to.

Accurately and efficiently determining your firm’s obligations is incredibly difficult, especially in the last decade as regulation has exploded in volume and complexity. 

This complexity is exacerbated by the fact that workers spend hours combing through mostly irrelevant information; based on Ascent’s internal analysis of regulatory text, only about 35 percent of any given regulation consists of actual obligations. The bulk of regulation – the remaining 65 percent – is made up of non-obligations such as definitions and clarifications. 

This challenging environment often has Risk and Compliance teams throwing up their hands in frustration; how do they get to the right obligations that matter to their firm, especially as rules continue to change? Is it even possible to do so without simply throwing more money and people at the problem? 

Recent advances in machine learning and other emergent technologies offer a path forward, but it is important to understand what makes some technologies more effective than others at pinpointing obligations from oceans of text.

Granularity: a crucial new concept in regulatory technology

In attempting to solve that problem, businesses need precision. Tools that offer a large breadth of regulatory information may provide value in terms of regulatory research and monitoring, but they do not solve the problem of helping firms target their exact obligations. This underscores the importance of granularity — in other words, precision.

Ascent generates the granular obligations that are relevant to your specific organization i.e. the individual requirements imposed on your firm, down to the line level of regulation. Granular obligations are independent of citation; as an example, a single rule may contain 1 or 100 obligations, or a sub-rule may contain 1 or 50 obligations. The takeaway is that obligations generated in Ascent are never an entire rule or large block of text that must be further analyzed by the user. 

INFOGRAPHIC: Regulatory Knowledge Automation, Explained


Instead they are broken down into specific obligations that are easy to understand and map to your internal compliance taxonomy (i.e. the real-life business topics and risk areas that your team organizes around, such as AML, consumer credit, cybersecurity, etc.).

This allows compliance workers to spend significantly less time and resources manually reading regulation and tracking changes, while also guaranteeing a high degree of accuracy. 

Granular obligations in Ascent provide a single source of regulatory truth, enabling businesses to standardize their data and keep it current with changing regulations. 

Granular obligations help you avoid fines and reduce risk

Effective compliance starts with having the right obligations in hand, then keeping them up to date. By providing granular obligations that are targeted to your business, Ascent ensures that you have the dynamic regulatory knowledge you need to effectively implement compliance throughout your organization, mitigate risk, and avoid fines and penalties. Learn more.

Compliance (and An SEC Exam) in the Time of COVID

By Blog

In this interview we sit down with Cheryl Pantano, a vice president and compliance manager who specializes in wealth management at RMB Capital Management, an SEC-registered investment advisory firm. In her role at RMB, Pantano is responsible for regulatory filings, writing policies and procedures, as well as conducting internal testing and mitigating overall risk. During our discussion Pantano touched on a variety of topics, including her team’s unenviable predicament of being both in the midst of a global pandemic and an SEC examination. 

Editor’s note: This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.

Prior to the pandemic, Pantano and her team were trying to wrap up their regular Q1 filing with the SEC, juggle requests for a separate examination with the SEC, and gear up for internal testing audits across RMB’s wealth management division.

In early March we were finishing up our regulatory filings for Q1, which is always a challenge in and of itself. As many compliance professionals know, Q1 is your biggest annual filing for the SEC due to the ADV form. Our ABD form is probably over 200 pages due to the fact that we have a lot of private funds and alternative investments, wealth management services, and asset allocation. In general, there are typically a lot of challenges in getting all of the data pulled together by the SEC’s deadline of March 31. 

Thankfully, we were able to compile all of that information early and file by March 17, before the pandemic really set in. But with a new year of filings there are different policies and procedures. Plus, we were (and still are) under SEC exam, which can often present more challenges in the forms of voluminous requests that require many departments, tight turnaround times, and an uncertain time frame of when the next request will come through. During an exam, you’re always on guard and ready to put down whatever you’re working on to address those new incoming requests. As an additional side note, I was also in the process of putting tests and forensic charts together for annual internal testing audits that I conduct on all of our wealth management teams around the country. 

In a twist of events, Pantano’s team received three additional requests from the SEC the weekend after all RMB staff started working from home—a move that required departments from across the firm to drop what they were doing to answer the voluminous and time sensitive requests.

As a result of the pandemic (and due to unforeseen requests by the SEC), our priorities had to shift. The irony here is that we started working from home and then that weekend we received three additional requests from the SEC. So that was, of course, a little overwhelming to suddenly be trying to work and answer time-sensitive requests in a remote environment, in the middle of a pandemic and a volatile market. Meanwhile, our advisors were doing everything they could to help our clients who were feeling the same uncertainty that were and trying to make sure that they felt comfortable.

But what happens when you receive an SEC request is a lot of departments other than compliance are affected. So everyone has to drop everything to fulfill a pretty voluminous request in a one to two-week time frame. As soon as the request came in, our compliance team got on the phone to review the request letter and discussed which departments would be needed to actually produce the documents for this request. Then we sent the request list to those departments and got on a WebEx meeting to walk through it with them together. It was a heavy lift, but everybody stepped up to the plate and we were able to answer the request despite the inopportune timing.

But unexpected requests have become the norm for Pantano and her team who have been under SEC examination since April 2019.

I always chuckle because I go to these compliance conferences and get a chance to commiserate with people who are in my same role, which is great because you’re suffering through the same things. However, I always found it surprising when people would raise their hand and say, “I’ve been in the business for 15 plus years and I’ve never been audited.” Meanwhile I’d think, “Wow, I’ve been in the business five and a half years and this is my fourth SEC audit.” I have learned a lot and I know now what to anticipate. 

This particular audit has been ongoing since April 2019. As anybody in the business would tell you, the regulators never really explain why they’re targeting your firm. But we always get the OCIE [the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations] alert lists and based on what OCIE is going to be focusing on for the year, we [RMB Capital] seem to really tick all the boxes. We are very complex in the fact that we’re not just a wealth management firm. We’ve grown quickly. When I started, we had 4.3 billion assets under management and now we have 7.8. We’ve also seen fast growth because we’ve had a few large acquisitions, so I do believe that’s what put us on their [the SEC’s] radar because we were changing and growing so much. 

The team witnessed the SEC’s pandemic response first hand when they received a call from their SEC examiner, who wanted to know if there was anything that the regulatory agency could do to help RMB with any COVID-related challenges. 

The OCIE did announce that they were planning to provide regulatory filing relief for firms, as many were adjusting to the pandemic, market vulnerability, and remote work. Due to the fact that we were in an ongoing exam, we did have a call with our examiner and she ticked off continuity questions like: “What you’ve been doing in response to the pandemic?” and “How have you been working remotely?” Then she did also ask us what the agency could do to assist us with challenges that our firm was facing. We didn’t take advantage of the regulatory filing relief, but it was good to know that we could have used it if we ran into an issue. 

Thankfully, help is never far away for Pantano and her team. Even in the face of obstacles from the pandemic, such as cancelled informational conferences, Pantano has strong connections within the industry who can help provide any additional filing guidance.

Typically, I rely on annual conferences as a source of knowledge and specific regulatory how-tos. However, with many of them cancelled this year, I turned to people who I had met at previous conferences and other industry friendlies to see how they were tackling the same challenges that were impacting our firm. A great example of this recently happened to me when we were trying to determine how to fulfill a new regulatory filing requirement [from the SEC] called a CRS form, which stands for client relationship summary. It’s a two page document that is basically a summary of your firm. It outlines your firm’s advisory services, conflicts, and fees, and is intended to be helpful for anybody who is considering hiring a financial advisor. 

However, we weren’t really given much guidance about this form aside from, “Here are your conversation starters. You have two pages and you have to name all these things.” But going from a 200-page document down to two pages seemed like a colossal task. So we reached out to the compliance consultants who were putting out templates and guides about the CRS form to make sure that we checked all of the boxes for those requirements, as well as other compliance professionals at firms similar to ours to see what they were doing. The form ended up being one of those situations where you have to get it over the finish line, but you also want to make sure that you’re doing it properly and really need to seek out additional guidance. 

Another area of business that shifted was Pantano’s annual internal testing audits, which are now scheduled to happen virtually this year.

We have wealth management teams in Chicago, Denver, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, and D.C., so I typically would travel to those offices and conduct an audit a week. I operate very much like the SEC does for us—I schedule the audit, but the teams don’t know when it’s going to be, the sample clients that I’m going to pull, or what the requests will be. 

The week before I’m scheduled to be on site, I send our teams the forensic testing chart so they have a week and a half to gather those documents and put them online for me to review. I do not review those until I’m on site. In the interim, if the teams have a question or determine that something isn’t applicable to them, they have time to reach out to me proactively before the audit so I can either pick a different client or ask a different question before arriving on site to discuss in person. Unfortunately those audits will have to be remote audits this year. The on-site part I’m going to miss, but I’m going to try to conduct it the same way virtually. 

While many developments have changed the course of business this year, Pantano has remained encouraged by RMB’s culture of compliance, even in a remote work environment.

Our former CCO instilled in me that we’re to never stop planning for things, mitigating risks, and being open to requests. Together, we always wanted to build a culture of compliance within the firm where people could ask us anything. We wanted our colleagues to know that we’d rather talk about something ahead of time versus asking for forgiveness later. We wanted them to come to us with a potential compliance risk so we could get down to what they were trying to accomplish, and then determine if there was a better way to approach this and still fall within our guidelines.

I worry mostly about the things that I don’t know. I can make an effort to repair things that I do know, but it’s the things I don’t know. However, I feel like our firm is pretty up to speed on what all of the teams are doing. We’re having more company meetings to touch base with one another. The fact that we already laid out this culture of compliance has helped in this environment because I already knew what we’re doing on a day to day basis, so not much has changed. But a lot of it is just good communication.

If you’d like to learn more about RMB Capital Management, visit their website. To learn more about Cheryl Pantano, connect with her on LinkedIn

If you’d like to contact an Ascent team member, you can do so here. Stay tuned for our next interview from the lines of defense. All interviews will be featured in our monthly Cliff Notes newsletter, which you can subscribe to below.

Subscribe to Cliff Notes


Ascent Welcomes Enterprise Technologist and Entrepreneur Chuck Papageorgiou to Industry Advisory Council

By Blog

“Brian and his team have leveraged the power of AI, combined with their deep expertise in regulatory compliance to bring exponential improvements and efficiencies to compliance management. I am looking forward to adding my expertise in those areas and contributing to the vision of the company and scaling its operations.” —Chuck Papageorgiou

 

Ascent announced today that Chuck Papageorgiou, Managing Partner at consulting firm Ideasphere Partners, will be joining its Industry Advisory Council (IAC). Led by Ascent CEO and Founder Brian Clark, the IAC was formed in Fall 2019 to provide industry expertise and high-level advice to the company’s management with regards to strategy, execution, and overall growth of Ascent. 

A market-proven Executive Leader, Business Operator, and Enterprise Technologist, Papageorgiou has over 20 years of experience in leading organizational turnarounds, business transformations, M&As, and launching startups. As an entrepreneur, Papageorgiou has raised, or was responsible for over $9B in M&A, Private Equity, and startup capital and has founded multiple companies, including WorldWatch Plus, an AI-driven risk management firm. As an operator he has lead global technology companies with thousands of employees.

“Brian and his team have leveraged the power of AI, combined with their deep expertise in regulatory compliance to bring exponential improvements and efficiencies to compliance management,” said Papageorgiou. “I am looking forward to adding my expertise in those areas and contributing to the vision of the company and scaling its operations.

“Ascent is on a mission to become the world’s leading RegTech company, and we do that by gathering the best minds around us,” said Clark. “As both an operational leader and a visionary in his field, Chuck is incredibly well-suited to provide the kind of guidance to Ascent that every younger-stage company truly needs to learn and grow. We’re honored to have him on board.”

The IAC’s other members are:

  • David Rudis, Former Executive at LaSalle National Bank and Bank of America
  • Scott Gordon, Former Leader of leading futures brokerage firm Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange
  • Ian Hollowbread, Head of RegTech Labs at ING

For more information on Ascent or the IAC, please reach out to press@ascentregtech.com.